Forcing oil companies to cover damages from extreme weather will lead to dramatically higher costs for fuel, electricity, natural gas, housing, and everyday goods.

The agency in charge of California’s energy transition is assuming a fantasy on electricity costs, EV charging, and vehicle miles traveled.

Having a blunder-prone state government manage fuel production is a terrible idea. But at least it might give Sacramento a sense of its costly policy choices.

The same government that can’t build housing, store water, or manage COVID testing may soon operate oil refineries. What could go wrong?

The electrification cost conundrum makes clear: to affordably and reliably meet demands, California still needs all forms of energy to work together.

For years, energy policy in the Golden State has been marked by politicized chaos and willful ignorance. To shift course in 2025, here are four key facts policymakers should know.

On refinery capacity losses and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Sacramento chooses to pretend all is well. Californians paying ever-higher gas prices surely disagree.

Declining in-state production means more foreign oil tankers coming to California ports, but the Golden State may not have the infrastructure to meet gasoline demand with imported crude.

A new state government report provides a much-needed reality check for the governor’s fanciful energy talking points.